Progress dump before ai agent

.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-PLAN.md

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# Phase 5.2: Compare Features and Select Optimal Solution
+
+## Goal
+Analyze the research findings, create a feature comparison matrix, and finalize the selection of the optimal TAK-compatible server implementation.
+
+## Tasks
+
+### Task 1: Create Feature Comparison Matrix
+
+Create a comprehensive comparison matrix based on the research findings in 05-01-RESEARCH.md:
+
+```markdown
+| Feature Category | FreeTAKServer | OpenTAKServer | TAK Product Center | Decision Criteria |
+|------------------|---------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------|
+| **Core Features** | | | | | |
+| COT Protocol Support | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
+| Web Interface | ✅ (basic) | ✅ (advanced) | ❌ | Must have | ✅ |
+| Geospatial Mapping | ✅ (OSM) | ✅ (OSM + custom) | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
+| Docker Support | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Must have | ✅ |
+| **Deployment** | | | | | |
+| Easy Installation | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| Platform Support | Ubuntu, AWS, Android | Ubuntu, RPi, Win, macOS | Enterprise | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| Resource Requirements | Medium | High | Very High | Consider | ⚠️ |
+| **Authentication** | | | | | |
+| LDAP Integration | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| 2FA Support | ❌ | ✅ (TOTP/email) | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| Client Certificates | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| **Features** | | | | | |
+| Video Streaming | ✅ | ✅ (MediaMTX) | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| REST API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| Federation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| Data Package Sync | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| **Maintenance** | | | | | |
+| Active Development | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| GitHub Stars | 861 | 1,200+ | 191 | Consider | ✅ |
+| Recent Releases | Yes | Yes (Dec 2025) | Yes | Nice to have | ✅ |
+| **Integration** | | | | | |
+| NixOS Compatibility | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Must verify | ⚠️ |
+| Traefik Support | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Must verify | ⚠️ |
+| **Security** | | | | | |
+| SSL/TLS | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
+| Encryption | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
+| Audit Logging | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
+```
+
+Save this matrix to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-COMPARISON.md`
+
+### Task 2: Analyze Comparison Results
+
+Review the comparison matrix and identify:
+- Which implementation meets all must-have requirements
+- Which implementation has the most nice-to-have features
+- Which implementation has potential integration issues
+- Any dealbreakers or concerns
+
+Update the comparison document with analysis section.
+
+### Task 3: Final Selection Decision
+
+Based on the comparison matrix and analysis:
+
+1. Confirm OpenTAKServer as the optimal choice
+2. Document final decision rationale
+3. Identify any concerns or risks
+4. Note any special requirements for implementation
+
+Save decision to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-DECISION.md`
+
+### Task 4: Prepare Implementation Requirements
+
+Based on the selected implementation (OpenTAKServer), document:
+- Specific Docker image to use
+- Configuration files needed
+- Environment variables required
+- Persistent storage requirements
+- Network port requirements
+- Security considerations (TLS, authentication, etc.)
+- Monitoring and logging requirements
+
+Save to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-IMPLEMENTATION_REQUIREMENTS.md`
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- ✅ Feature comparison matrix created and saved
+- ✅ Analysis of comparison results completed
+- ✅ Final selection decision documented with rationale
+- ✅ Implementation requirements documented
+- ✅ All files created in phase directory
+- ✅ Ready to proceed to Phase 6 implementation
+
+## Notes
+
+- Reference the research report (05-01-RESEARCH.md) for detailed information
+- Use the comparison matrix to make objective decisions
+- Document all considerations for future reference
+- Ensure decision aligns with project requirements