96 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
|
# Phase 5.2: Compare Features and Select Optimal Solution
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Goal
|
||
|
|
Analyze the research findings, create a feature comparison matrix, and finalize the selection of the optimal TAK-compatible server implementation.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Tasks
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Task 1: Create Feature Comparison Matrix
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Create a comprehensive comparison matrix based on the research findings in 05-01-RESEARCH.md:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```markdown
|
||
|
|
| Feature Category | FreeTAKServer | OpenTAKServer | TAK Product Center | Decision Criteria |
|
||
|
|
|------------------|---------------|---------------|--------------------|-------------------|
|
||
|
|
| **Core Features** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| COT Protocol Support | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Web Interface | ✅ (basic) | ✅ (advanced) | ❌ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Geospatial Mapping | ✅ (OSM) | ✅ (OSM + custom) | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Docker Support | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| **Deployment** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| Easy Installation | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Platform Support | Ubuntu, AWS, Android | Ubuntu, RPi, Win, macOS | Enterprise | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Resource Requirements | Medium | High | Very High | Consider | ⚠️ |
|
||
|
|
| **Authentication** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| LDAP Integration | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| 2FA Support | ❌ | ✅ (TOTP/email) | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Client Certificates | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| **Features** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| Video Streaming | ✅ | ✅ (MediaMTX) | ❌ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| REST API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Federation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Data Package Sync | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| **Maintenance** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| Active Development | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| GitHub Stars | 861 | 1,200+ | 191 | Consider | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Recent Releases | Yes | Yes (Dec 2025) | Yes | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| **Integration** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| NixOS Compatibility | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Must verify | ⚠️ |
|
||
|
|
| Traefik Support | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Must verify | ⚠️ |
|
||
|
|
| **Security** | | | | | |
|
||
|
|
| SSL/TLS | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Encryption | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Must have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
| Audit Logging | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Save this matrix to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-COMPARISON.md`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Task 2: Analyze Comparison Results
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Review the comparison matrix and identify:
|
||
|
|
- Which implementation meets all must-have requirements
|
||
|
|
- Which implementation has the most nice-to-have features
|
||
|
|
- Which implementation has potential integration issues
|
||
|
|
- Any dealbreakers or concerns
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Update the comparison document with analysis section.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Task 3: Final Selection Decision
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Based on the comparison matrix and analysis:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Confirm OpenTAKServer as the optimal choice
|
||
|
|
2. Document final decision rationale
|
||
|
|
3. Identify any concerns or risks
|
||
|
|
4. Note any special requirements for implementation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Save decision to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-DECISION.md`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Task 4: Prepare Implementation Requirements
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Based on the selected implementation (OpenTAKServer), document:
|
||
|
|
- Specific Docker image to use
|
||
|
|
- Configuration files needed
|
||
|
|
- Environment variables required
|
||
|
|
- Persistent storage requirements
|
||
|
|
- Network port requirements
|
||
|
|
- Security considerations (TLS, authentication, etc.)
|
||
|
|
- Monitoring and logging requirements
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Save to `.planning/phases/05-tak-research/05-02-IMPLEMENTATION_REQUIREMENTS.md`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- ✅ Feature comparison matrix created and saved
|
||
|
|
- ✅ Analysis of comparison results completed
|
||
|
|
- ✅ Final selection decision documented with rationale
|
||
|
|
- ✅ Implementation requirements documented
|
||
|
|
- ✅ All files created in phase directory
|
||
|
|
- ✅ Ready to proceed to Phase 6 implementation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Notes
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Reference the research report (05-01-RESEARCH.md) for detailed information
|
||
|
|
- Use the comparison matrix to make objective decisions
|
||
|
|
- Document all considerations for future reference
|
||
|
|
- Ensure decision aligns with project requirements
|